CareerGuardAI exposure reports
ReportsRankingsInsightsSkills CheckResources
Sign inCheck my job

Compare roles · AI exposure side by side

Licensed Practical Nurses

Put up to three roles next to each other: the exposure figure, the inputs behind it, the window, what is driving change, and where the work moves. Every figure comes from the same method, so the gap between two scores means something.

Licensed Practical Nurses

Exposure

Licensed Practical Nurses
9

Low exposure

More exposed than 1% of 250 roles

Window · adoption

7–15 yrs

until most of the change has landed

Low-Medium adoption

In one line

AI touches charting, scheduling and monitoring alerts, but bedside care, medication rounds and patient observation remain hands-on work.

Inputs behind the score · scaled 0–100

Task applicability

7

Observed usage

0

Official exposure tier

10

Labour-market trajectory

n/a

Published adoption rating

25

What is driving it

  1. Low generative-AI task overlap
  2. Health record documentation features
  3. Patient monitoring and early-warning systems
  4. Automated dispensing and supply logistics
  5. Workforce shortages
  6. Slow adoption in long-term care

Skills worth building

  1. Clinical observation and assessment
  2. Hands-on procedural competence
  3. Working with monitoring systems
  4. Health record fluency
  5. Communication and reassurance
  6. Career progression planning

Tools in the work now

  1. Epic
  2. Oracle Health
  3. Omnicell
  4. care.ai

Where the work moves

Medical Transcriptionists55

More exposed

Registered Nurses34

Different skills, growing

Healthcare Assistants19

Complementary, less exposed

Full report

Read Licensed Practical Nurses

Scores are the CareerGuard Exposure Index v2: the same five inputs and weights for every role, so a gap of ten points means the same thing wherever it appears. How scores are built.