CareerGuardAI exposure reports
ReportsRankingsInsightsSkills CheckResources
Sign inCheck my job

Compare roles · AI exposure side by side

Tutors

Put up to three roles next to each other: the exposure figure, the inputs behind it, the window, what is driving change, and where the work moves. Every figure comes from the same method, so the gap between two scores means something.

Tutors

Exposure

Tutors
71

High exposure

More exposed than 90% of 250 roles

Window · adoption

1–4 yrs

until most of the change has landed

Very High adoption

In one line

AI tutors now explain concepts, mark practice work and adapt to each learner on demand, pushing human tutors toward motivation, accountability and harder cases.

Inputs behind the score · scaled 0–100

Task applicability

58

Observed usage

54

Official exposure tier

100

Labour-market trajectory

n/a

Published adoption rating

85

What is driving it

  1. Conversational AI tutors
  2. Subject-specific apps
  3. Platform integration
  4. Student-led adoption
  5. Cost pressure on families and schools
  6. Adaptive learning data

Skills worth building

  1. Diagnostic teaching
  2. Motivation and coaching
  3. AI tool fluency
  4. Special needs expertise
  5. Exam and curriculum knowledge
  6. Parent and student communication

Tools in the work now

  1. Khanmigo
  2. ChatGPT
  3. Quizlet
  4. Photomath

Where the work moves

Interpreters and Translators83

More exposed

Special Education Teachers38

Different skills, growing

School Counselors54

Complementary, less exposed

Full report

Read Tutors

Scores are the CareerGuard Exposure Index v2: the same five inputs and weights for every role, so a gap of ten points means the same thing wherever it appears. How scores are built.