CareerGuardAI exposure reports
ReportsInsightsSkills CheckResources
Sign inCheck my job
All roles
AI impact reportNo. 295 · revised 4 October 2026 · 202 roles covered

Patent Attorneys

AI fundamentally restructuring patent search, drafting, and portfolio management for attorneys.

Exposure
60
High exposure
higher than 69% of 202 roles
Window
2–5 yrs
until change lands
Adoption today
High
Reading

Substantial automation of routine work.

Exposure is the share of today's work AI can plausibly take on within the window.

Readers' scoreloading
Readers say
—
We say
60
0┊ our figure 60100

Nobody has scored this role yet. Be the first: your figure sits next to ours and feeds the readers’ average.

Add your score
60

High exposure

little of the workmost of the work
When does change land?
0/600

Patent Attorneys

60
01 Overview02 Where you stand03 What this means for you04 Drivers of change05 Impact by sector06 Skills to build07 Tools in use08 In practice09 How this role compares10 Closing judgement11 Evidence and revisions12 Readers' view13 Method and sources
§ 01What is happening

What is happening to patent attorneys

Impact

AI tools are autonomously performing prior art searches, generating initial patent claims, analyzing patent landscapes, and streamlining administrative tasks. This compels Patent Attorneys to radically pivot towards high-level strategic intellectual property (IP) counseling, complex legal negotiation, ethical oversight of AI, and fostering irreplaceable human client relationships.

Risk

Radical role overhaul; pervasive automation leading to significant workflow redefinition and specialized human focus.

The Patent Attorney role is undergoing a profound and accelerating redefinition by AI. AI will assume command of vast routine data collection, initial prior art searches, and much of the administrative burden. Patent Attorneys must immediately pivot to becoming experts in leveraging AI for hyper-efficiency and enhanced strategic insights, intensely validating AI outputs for accuracy and legal soundness, and dedicating their expertise to the irreplaceable human elements of the role: profound understanding of complex inventions, nuanced strategic counseling, and critical ethical decision-making regarding intellectual property protection and innovation.

Sector readiness

Rapid & Transformative Integration

The intellectual property (IP) and legal sectors are aggressively integrating AI, driven by overwhelming demand for efficiency, speed in patent prosecution, and advanced risk mitigation. AI is rapidly moving beyond pilot stages to widespread adoption for patent search, drafting, and portfolio management, fundamentally altering traditional workflows.

§ 02Position

Where you stand

i

The Patent Attorney role is undergoing a profound and accelerating redefinition by AI, fundamentally restructuring patent search, drafting, and portfolio management.

ii

AI will autonomously manage vast routine data, optimize search, and streamline drafting, compelling Patent Attorneys to pivot to indispensable strategic IP counseling and profound human client relationships.

iii

Survival and impact will hinge on Patent Attorneys mastering AI tools, critically validating AI outputs for legal soundness, championing ethical AI, and providing irreplaceable human judgment and advocacy at the heart of innovation protection.

§ 03Actions
15 points

What this means for you

Concrete changes to how the work gets done, in the order you are likely to meet them.

  1. 01

    AI-Driven Autonomous Prior Art Search. Patent Attorneys will oversee AI systems that autonomously scan vast databases of patents, scientific literature, and technical documents for prior art relevant to a new invention. This radically frees attorneys from manual search, enabling hyper-fast and comprehensive novelty assessments.

  2. 02

    AI-Powered Automated Patent Drafting (Claims & Specifications). AI tools will autonomously generate initial drafts of patent claims, detailed descriptions of inventions (specifications), and even figures based on technical inputs. Patent Attorneys will rigorously review these AI outputs for legal precision, clarity, and strategic coverage.

  3. 03

    Predictive Analytics for Patent Prosecution Outcomes. Patent Attorneys will leverage AI models that autonomously analyze historical patent office data, examiner behavior, and application characteristics to predict the likelihood of patent allowance or the optimal strategy for responding to office actions. This informs prosecution strategies.

  4. 04

    AI-Assisted Patent Landscape Analysis. AI tools will autonomously map vast patent landscapes, identifying white spaces for innovation, potential infringement risks, and competitor patent strategies. Patent Attorneys will leverage these insights for strategic IP counseling and competitive analysis.

  5. 05

    Generative AI for Legal Arguments & Responses. AI can autonomously draft initial versions of legal arguments for patent prosecution (e.g., responses to office actions), infringement analyses, and licensing agreements. This streamlines communication, ensuring consistency and allowing attorneys to focus on strategic insights and nuanced legal reasoning.

  6. 06

    Focus on Nuanced Client Counseling & Strategic IP Portfolio. As AI assumes command of data-driven tasks, the paramount value of Patent Attorneys will be their irreplaceable human ability to deeply understand complex inventions, provide strategic IP portfolio advice tailored to client business goals, and navigate intricate legal landscapes.

  7. 07

    AI-Driven Infringement Detection. AI systems are autonomously monitoring global markets and online platforms for potential patent infringement, identifying products or technologies that may violate existing patents. Patent Attorneys will investigate these AI-flagged instances for legal action.

  8. 08

    Ethical AI in Patent Law & Bias Mitigation. Patent Attorneys will bear profound responsibility for auditing AI systems for algorithmic bias (e.g., in prior art search, patent validity predictions), ensuring data privacy, and upholding ethical standards for fair and equitable IP protection and innovation.

  9. 09

    Human-AI Teaming for Patent Prosecution. Patent Attorneys will operate in seamless human-AI teams. AI will process vast data, generate initial drafts, and provide predictive insights, while the human attorney leads the complex legal arguments, applies nuanced judgment, and manages exceptions, particularly in high-stakes litigation.

  10. 10

    AI for Trademark & Copyright Monitoring. AI tools will autonomously monitor global databases and online content for potential trademark infringement or copyright violations. Patent Attorneys will leverage these tools to protect client intellectual property beyond just patents.

  11. 11

    Continuous Learning & IP Tech Literacy. The exponential pace of AI integration in IP law demands that Patent Attorneys commit to continuous, aggressive learning of new AI-powered tools, advanced legal tech, and their profound capabilities and ethical implications, as a foundational competency for effective IP practice.

  12. 12

    Specialization in AI-Driven IP Strategy. The field will see a rise in Patent Attorneys specializing in designing, implementing, and managing AI-powered IP solutions, acting as primary points of contact for digital transformation initiatives within IP law firms or corporate legal departments.

  13. 13

    AI-Powered Patent Valuation. AI tools can autonomously analyze patent strength, market relevance, and licensing potential to provide preliminary valuations for patent portfolios during M&A or licensing negotiations. Patent Attorneys will validate these AI outputs.

  14. 14

    Leadership in IP Portfolio Transformation. Patent Attorneys in leadership roles will play a crucial role in guiding their firms or organizations through the pervasive adoption of AI, advocating for strategic AI solutions, and fundamentally reshaping the future of intellectual property protection and innovation.

  15. 15

    Strategic Client Acquisition & IP Value Proposition. As AI automates many operational tasks, Patent Attorneys will dedicate more time to crafting compelling value propositions, strategically acquiring high-value clients, and demonstrating the irreplaceable human touch in IP advisory services.

§ 04Causes
10 drivers

What is pushing this change

  1. 01

    Explosive Growth of Technical & Patent Data. Vast amounts of patent documents, scientific literature, technical specifications, and legal precedents provide rich input for AI models.

  2. 02

    Advancements in AI/ML (NLP, Generative AI, Predictive Analytics). Breakthroughs in AI fields enable sophisticated text understanding, autonomous content generation, and intelligent predictions for patent law.

  3. 03

    Urgent Demand for Speed & Efficiency in Patent Prosecution. Businesses demand faster patent filing, quicker prosecution, and efficient prior art searches to protect their innovations.

  4. 04

    Complexity of Global Patent Laws & Technical Inventions. Navigating diverse global patent systems and understanding complex technical inventions across multiple jurisdictions is challenging; AI assists.

  5. 05

    Need for Proactive IP Strategy & Risk Mitigation. AI can identify potential infringement risks, white spaces for innovation, and optimize patent claims proactively.

  6. 06

    Shortage of Skilled Patent Professionals. The demand for patent attorneys with deep technical and legal expertise often outstrips supply; AI can augment.

  7. 07

    Growth of Digital Patent Offices & E-filing. The shift to electronic filing and digital patent offices provides vast digital data inputs for AI processing.

  8. 08

    Client Expectations for Faster & More Comprehensive IP Services. Clients expect rapid, comprehensive patent searches, efficient drafting, and strategic IP advice.

  9. 09

    Global Competition in Innovation. Companies fiercely compete on innovation; robust and efficient IP protection is crucial for competitive advantage.

  10. 10

    Focus on IP Asset Monetization. AI can help identify licensing opportunities, cross-licensing potential, and monetize IP assets more effectively.

§ 05Variation
5 sectors

Impact by sector

The headline figure is an average. Where you work changes the picture.

Patent Prosecution Attorneys

AI for prior art search, claim drafting, and response to office actions. Focus on securing patents efficiently.

Patent Litigators

AI for e-discovery in patent litigation, analyzing prior art for invalidity arguments, and predicting case outcomes. Focus on strategic litigation.

In-House Patent Counsel

AI for patent portfolio management, internal landscape analysis, and identifying potential infringement risks. Focus on in-house IP strategy.

Trademark Attorneys

AI for global trademark search, infringement monitoring, and managing trademark portfolios. Focus on brand protection.

Licensing Attorneys

AI for analyzing licensing agreements, identifying key terms, and valuing IP for negotiation. Focus on deal structuring and monetization.

§ 06Preparation
8 skills

Skills to build

The skills that keep the human part of this work valuable as the routine part is automated.

  1. 01

    Patent Law & IP Regulations. Deep and current knowledge of patent law, intellectual property regulations (e.g., USPTO, EPO), and international treaties.

  2. 02

    AI/Legal Tech Literacy & Oversight. Proficiency in using AI-powered patent search, drafting, and analytics tools, and interpreting AI-generated insights.

  3. 03

    Technical Acumen (Science/Engineering). Profound understanding of the scientific or engineering principles underlying inventions to accurately describe and claim them.

  4. 04

    Critical Thinking & Strategic Analysis. Ability to scrutinize AI-generated claims or analyses for legal soundness, identify strategic implications, and make nuanced decisions.

  5. 05

    Ethical AI Use & IP Ownership. Upholding the highest ethical standards in IP practice, understanding authorship for AI-generated inventions, and navigating IP ownership.

  6. 06

    Communication & Negotiation. Clearly articulating complex technical concepts, legal arguments, and strategic advice to inventors, clients, and patent offices.

  7. 07

    Problem-Solving & Legal Reasoning. The ability to diagnose and resolve ambiguous legal issues, handle complex office actions, and adapt to evolving IP landscapes.

  8. 08

    Adaptability & Continuous Learning. Willingness to rapidly learn new AI technologies, adapt IP methodologies, and continuously update knowledge in a dynamic field.

§ 07Instruments
12 entries

Tools in use

Kinds of tool worth knowing

  1. 01

    AI-Powered Prior Art Search Tools. Software that uses AI to autonomously search vast databases of patents and non-patent literature for relevant prior art.

  2. 02

    Generative AI for Patent Drafting. Large Language Models (LLMs) specialized for patent law that autonomously draft initial versions of patent claims and specifications.

  3. 03

    AI for Patent Landscape Analysis. AI tools that autonomously analyze patent databases to map technology landscapes, identify white spaces, and assess competitor portfolios.

  4. 04

    Predictive Analytics for Patent Prosecution. AI models that autonomously analyze historical patent office data and application characteristics to predict prosecution outcomes or office action responses.

  5. 05

    AI for IP Infringement Monitoring. AI systems that autonomously monitor global markets and online platforms for potential patent, trademark, or copyright infringement.

  6. 06

    AI for Legal Research & Compliance. AI-powered search engines that autonomously sift through vast legal databases, case law, and regulations to provide instant, precise answers for IP law.

Named tools already in use

  • Patsnap (AI IP Platform) / IP.com (AI Prior Art Search)

    Visit

    Leading AI-powered IP platforms that leverage AI for prior art search, patent analysis, and portfolio management.

  • LegalRobot (for drafting contracts, illustrative concept) / LexisNexis (Lexis+ AI)

    Visit

    AI-powered platforms that can assist in drafting legal documents, with some specific features for patent claims.

  • Cipher (Patent Analytics AI) / PatSeer (IP Platform with AI)

    Visit

    AI-driven platforms that analyze patent data for strategic insights, including landscape mapping and competitor analysis.

  • Juristat (AI for Patent Prosecution Analytics) / LexisNexis (Legal Analytics)

    Visit

    AI-powered analytics tools that predict outcomes in patent prosecution or litigation, informing strategic decisions.

  • Clarivate (Derwent AI) / IPProtect (AI for Infringement)

    Visit

    AI platforms that autonomously monitor global IP for infringement and identify potential violations.

  • Thomson Reuters (Westlaw Edge AI) / CaseText (CoCounsel AI)

    Visit

    Leading legal research platforms that integrate generative AI for enhanced search, analysis, and drafting assistance.

§ 08Examples
5 examples

In practice

Ways people in this role are already using AI, and what they get from it.

Automate Prior Art SearchExample 1
How

Patent Attorneys will utilize an AI-powered prior art search tool. By inputting invention details, the AI will autonomously scan billions of patents and technical documents globally, identifying highly relevant prior art and generating a comprehensive report for review.

Gain

Significantly reduces manual search time, ensures hyper-comprehensive coverage of prior art, and accelerates novelty assessments.

Generate Patent Claim DraftsExample 2
How

Patent Attorneys will instruct a generative AI tool to draft initial patent claims for a new invention. By providing the invention's key features and technical scope, the AI will autonomously generate a set of claims for the attorney's rigorous legal and strategic refinement.

Gain

Drastically reduces manual drafting effort, ensures consistent claim language, and allows attorneys to focus on legal strategy and precision.

Analyze Patent LandscapesExample 3
How

Patent Attorneys will leverage an AI platform that autonomously analyzes vast global patent databases. The AI will map technology landscapes, identify white spaces for innovation, and pinpoint competitor patent strategies, generating strategic insights for IP portfolio management.

Gain

Provides unparalleled strategic insights into market trends, competitive IP, and innovation opportunities, guiding R&D investment.

Predict Patent Prosecution OutcomesExample 4
How

Patent Attorneys will use an AI model that autonomously analyzes historical patent office data, examiner behavior, and application characteristics. The AI will predict the likelihood of patent allowance or the optimal strategy for responding to an office action, guiding prosecution.

Gain

Enables proactive prosecution strategies, reduces prosecution time, and improves the likelihood of patent allowance.

Detect Patent InfringementExample 5
How

Patent Attorneys will deploy an AI system that autonomously monitors global markets and online platforms. The AI will use computer vision and text analysis to identify products or technologies that may infringe on existing patents, flagging potential violations for investigation.

Gain

Enhances IP protection, reduces losses from infringement, and provides early warning of potential legal challenges.

§ 09Context

How this role compares

Three neighbouring roles chosen to show the direction of travel, then the roles either side of yours on the exposure scale.

Legal Researchers (Basic search) / Patent Clerks (Routine filing)More exposed
AI impact

Catastrophic (AI can autonomously conduct vast prior art searches; AI can automate routine patent filing and data entry.)

Work moves to

Immediate need for radical re-skilling into AI oversight, data quality management for AI, or specialization in complex IP litigation.

AI Legal Tech Developers / AI IP Data ScientistsDifferent skills, growing · exposure 55
AI impact

Foundational (They design and build the AI algorithms and systems that power advanced patent search and analysis.)

Work moves to

Deep expertise in AI/ML algorithms, NLP, data science, and software engineering, with a focus on intellectual property law.

IP Litigators (Courtroom advocacy) / Inventors (Core innovation)Complementary, less exposed
AI impact

Low-Moderate Augmentation (AI assists in e-discovery for litigators; AI helps with research for inventors), but core legal argumentation, complex negotiation, and fundamental creative ideation remain paramount.

Work moves to

Complex legal argumentation, courtroom advocacy, and client representation in IP disputes (Litigators); Generating novel ideas, fundamental scientific breakthroughs, and the core act of invention (Inventors).

Nearby on the scaleExposure · window
  1. Shop Assistants/Retail Sales Assistants

    602–5 yrs
  2. Strategy Consultants

    602–5 yrs
  3. Tax Attorneys

    602–5 yrs
  4. Patent Attorneys · this report

    602–5 yrs
  5. Accountants and Auditors

    651–4 yrs
  6. Business Intelligence Analysts

    652–5 yrs
  7. Computer Support Specialists

    652–5 yrs
§ 10Verdict

Closing judgement

For Patent Attorneys, AI is not merely a tool but a radical force of transformation that will fundamentally redefine their role. It will autonomously handle the mundane, amplify research and drafting capabilities, and streamline portfolio management, compelling attorneys to pivot to indispensable strategic IP counseling, profound client relationships, and ethical oversight. The future Patent Attorney will be a visionary orchestrator of human-AI collaboration, providing irreplaceable judgment and advocacy at the heart of innovation.

§ 11Basis
revised 4 October 2026

Evidence and revisions

What the exposure figure rests on, what changed when it was last revised, and the published work cited for this role.

Score

60 (held)

Window

2-5 years (unchanged)

The 4 October 2026 review held the score.

Microsoft's AI applicability score for the matching occupation is 0.18, in the upper half of 785 US occupations; Anthropic's observed exposure (the share of the occupation's tasks already being done with Claude) is 0.17, which is substantial by the standards of the 756 occupations measured; the US Bureau of Labor Statistics places it in the 'very high' AI-exposure tier; BLS projects employment to grow 4.7% over 2025–35. Taken together this is consistent with our previous figure of 60, which we have held.

Measures behind the score5 sources

US Bureau of Labor Statistics · Employment Projections 2025–35 and AI Exposure Categories

Official statistics · 27 August 2026

AI-exposure tier: Very high. Projected employment change 2025–35: +4.7%. Matched to Lawyers.

Publisher PDF Archived copy Data

Microsoft Research · Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations

Working paper · 10 July 2025

AI applicability score 0.18 (percentile 64 of 785 occupations) for SOC 23-1011.

Anthropic · Anthropic Economic Index report: Cadences

Report · 26 June 2026

Observed exposure 0.17 for SOC 23-1011 (percentile 82 of 756 occupations).

World Economic Forum · The Future of Jobs Report 2025

Report · 7 January 2025

Legal secretaries and legal officials appear on the WEF declining list for the first time in the 2025 edition.

UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology · Assessment of AI capabilities and the impact on the UK labour market

Report · 28 January 2026

UK context: around 70% of UK workers are in occupations with tasks AI could perform or enhance, above the US average; a one-standard-deviation rise in exposure was associated with a 3.9% fall in UK job postings.

Also cited for this role1 sources

McKinsey Global Institute · Agents, robots, and us: Skill partnerships in the age of AI

Report · 25 November 2025

Legal work is named among the "agent-centric" occupations where more than half of working hours are technically automatable with demonstrated AI agents.

Archived copies are served only where the licence permits; otherwise the link goes to the publisher. Full research library →

§ 12Second opinion

Readers' view

What people who do this work make of our reading: their own scores, their reasons, and the notes they left on each section.

Our report is one reading of the evidence. This section is the other dataset: what people who do or know this work make of it. Nobody has scored this role yet. Sign in to add yours.

Scoresreaders vs. our figure
Readers (mean)

—

Readers (median)

—

CareerGuard

60

0┊ our figure 60100
Why readers chose their number

No one has explained their score yet. A line or two about what you see in your own work is the most useful thing on this page.

Most helpful notes

No notes yet. Every section above has a “Readers' notes” line at the bottom; open one and say what you know.

§ 13Appendix

Method and sources

Each report was written from a large body of published research and then, in October 2026, re-scored against occupation-level evidence: the US Bureau of Labor Statistics AI-exposure classification and 2025–35 projections, Microsoft Research’s AI applicability scores and Anthropic’s observed-exposure data, cross-checked against the reports listed in the Evidence section above. The organisations and publications below are the standing literature behind the narrative sections. Every source, with dates, licences and archived copies where we are permitted to hold them, is catalogued in the research library.

Scores are revised by blending the previous editorial figure (60%) with a composite of the three occupation-level measures (40%), capped at fifteen points per revision and rounded to the nearest five. The window shifts one notch when a score moves ten points or more. Hand adjustments are recorded with their reason in the revision log.

Research library: every source, with dates, licences and archived copies →

IGlobal and macroeconomic impact of AI on work
World Economic Forum
The Future of Jobs Report series — Employer survey of expected job growth and decline, skill shifts and technology adoption (2020, 2023 and 2025 editions); Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Entry-Level Work (2026).
AI governance and transformation reports — Frameworks on ethical AI, talent strategy and industry transformation.
McKinsey Global Institute
AI, Automation and the Future of Work series — Research quantifying automation potential by task, sector and demographic, from "Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained" to "Agents, robots, and us" (2025).
Industry-specific reports — Financial services, healthcare, manufacturing and others.
PwC
Global AI Jobs Barometer — Annual analysis of job postings and productivity by AI exposure (2024–2026 editions).
Upskilling Hopes and Fears survey — Employee perceptions and readiness.
Microsoft Research and Anthropic
Working with AI (2025); Anthropic Economic Index (2025–2026) — Occupation-level usage data from Copilot and Claude conversations, the two observed-usage measures behind the 2026 revision.
Stanford Digital Economy Lab and Stanford HAI
Canaries in the Coal Mine? (2025–2026); AI Index Report (annual) — Payroll evidence on early-career employment in exposed occupations; annual measurement of AI capability, investment and adoption.
Deloitte
Human Capital Trends series — Workforce, talent and HR technology trends.
Tech Trends series — Emerging technologies and their business implications.
Accenture
Technology Vision series — Forward-looking analysis of emerging technology, with emphasis on AI.
Fjord Trends — Design, innovation and human experience in a digital world.
Boston Consulting Group
AI/ML insights and industry solutions — "The AI Revolution in the Workplace" and related research.
EY
AI and workforce reports — Adoption, talent strategy and ethics.
IBM Institute for Business Value
AI and automation studies — Business models, workforce evolution and leadership.
OECD
AI Policy Observatory — International data and policy on AI, labour markets and skills.
Employment Outlook — Labour-market trends including technological impact (2023–2026 editions).
International Labour Organization
Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (2025) — Task-level exposure gradients for every ISCO occupation; successor to the 2023 global index.
International Monetary Fund
Staff Discussion Notes on AI and work (2024, 2026) — Complementarity framing: where AI augments and where it substitutes.
UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Assessment of AI capabilities and the impact on the UK labour market (2026) — UK occupational exposure and job-posting evidence.
Brookings Institution
AI and automation research — Economic and social implications, displacement and skills.
Yale Budget Lab and Goldman Sachs Research
Tracking the Impact of AI on the Labor Market; AI and the US labour market (2026) — Aggregate labour-market monitoring; macro displacement estimates.
Oxford University (Oxford Martin School)
The Future of Employment — Frey & Osborne and subsequent research on susceptibility to automation.
MIT Technology Review
AI & Work — Reporting on AI research and its implications for industries and jobs.
Gartner
Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence — Maturity and adoption of AI technologies.
Future of Work reports — Workplace models and talent strategy.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Employment Projections 2025–35; AI Exposure Categories; Occupational Outlook Handbook — Ten-year employment projections and, from the 2025 cycle, an AI-exposure tier for every detailed occupation.
Indeed Hiring Lab
AI at Work Report (2025) and posting-market updates — Skill-level transformation estimates and job-posting trends by occupation.
IICore AI and machine-learning research
OpenAI
Research papers, blog and API documentation — Large language models, generative AI, safety and societal impact.
Google DeepMind
Research papers and blog — Reinforcement learning, AI for science, AGI and ethics.
Meta AI
Research papers and blog — Large language models, computer vision, AI for social good.
Hugging Face
Transformers library and model hub — Open-source state-of-the-art NLP models.
TensorFlow and PyTorch
Documentation and community forums — Core frameworks illustrating practical capability.
arXiv
cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.CV, cs.CL — Pre-print research.
NeurIPS and ICML
Conference proceedings — Top-tier academic research.
ACM and IEEE
Journals and proceedings — ACM Computing Surveys; IEEE Transactions on AI.
Kaggle
Datasets and competition solutions — Applied machine learning on real-world problems.
The Alan Turing Institute
Research and reports — Responsible and applied AI.
IIIEthical and responsible AI deployment
NIST
AI Risk Management Framework — Voluntary framework for managing AI risk.
European Commission
AI Act — Risk-tiered legal framework for AI.
Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI — Principles for responsible development.
Partnership on AI
Research and best practice — Responsible AI development.
AI Now Institute
Annual reports — Social implications: power, inequality, rights.
ACM FAccT
Proceedings — Fairness, accountability and transparency.
Data & Society
Publications — Social implications of data-centric technology.
WIPO
Conversation on IP and AI — Intellectual-property implications of AI.
IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of A/IS
Ethically Aligned Design — Recommendations for ethical AI design.
Center for AI and Digital Policy
Policy briefs — Accountable AI policy.
Report No. 295 · Patent AttorneysPDF · Markdown · Research library · Reading →