CareerGuardAI exposure reports
ReportsRankingsInsightsSkills CheckResources
Sign inCheck my job

Compare roles · AI exposure side by side

Receptionists

Put up to three roles next to each other: the exposure figure, the inputs behind it, the window, what is driving change, and where the work moves. Every figure comes from the same method, so the gap between two scores means something.

Receptionists

Exposure

Receptionists
65

High exposure

More exposed than 80% of 250 roles

Window · adoption

1–4 yrs

until most of the change has landed

High adoption

In one line

AI phone agents, online booking and visitor kiosks are handling calls, appointments and check-ins, cutting the routine core of the receptionist role.

Inputs behind the score · scaled 0–100

Task applicability

48

Observed usage

58

Official exposure tier

100

Labour-market trajectory

n/a

Published adoption rating

70

What is driving it

  1. AI phone agents
  2. Online scheduling and automated reminders
  3. Visitor-management kiosks
  4. Generative email and admin assistance
  5. Small-business cost pressure
  6. Hybrid working and shared front-of-house

Skills worth building

  1. Office and facilities coordination
  2. System administration for front-office tools
  3. De-escalation and safeguarding
  4. Customer and patient service judgement
  5. Written communication with AI assistance
  6. Data handling and confidentiality

Tools in the work now

  1. Smith.ai
  2. Dialpad
  3. Envoy
  4. Microsoft 365 Copilot

Where the work moves

Telemarketers76

More exposed

Office Administrators62

Different skills, growing

Security Guards38

Complementary, less exposed

Full report

Read Receptionists

Scores are the CareerGuard Exposure Index v2: the same five inputs and weights for every role, so a gap of ten points means the same thing wherever it appears. How scores are built.