CareerGuardAI exposure reports
ReportsRankingsInsightsSkills CheckResources
Sign inCheck my job
All roles
AI impact reportNo. 352 · revised 5 October 2026 · 250 roles covered

Market Research Analysts

AI now designs surveys, codes open-ended responses, summarises transcripts and drafts reports, compressing weeks of analysis into days.

Exposure
78
Very high exposure
higher than 97% of 250 roles
Window
0–3 yrs
until change lands
Adoption today
Very High
Reading

Core tasks are being automated now.

Exposure is the share of today's work AI can plausibly take on within the window.

Readers' scoreloading
Readers say
—
We say
78
0┊ our figure 78100

Nobody has scored this role yet. Be the first: your figure sits next to ours and feeds the readers’ average.

Add your score
78

Very high exposure

little of the workmost of the work
When does change land?
0/600

Market Research Analysts

78
01 Overview02 Where you stand03 What this means for you04 Drivers of change05 Impact by sector06 Skills to build07 Tools in use08 In practice09 How this role compares10 Closing judgement11 Evidence and revisions12 Readers' view13 Method and sources
§ 01What is happening

What is happening to market research analysts

Impact

Survey platforms such as Qualtrics and SurveyMonkey generate questionnaires, check them for bias and theme thousands of open-text answers automatically. Qualitative work is changing too: Remesh and similar tools run large-scale moderated conversations and cluster the responses, while general models summarise interview transcripts and pull out quotes. The analyst's day shifts from cleaning data and writing first drafts to choosing the question, checking the machine's reading of the evidence and explaining what it means to a client who has to act on it.

Risk

Analysis and reporting are automating fast; human value moves to research design, interpretation and client counsel.

Occupation-level measures place the role in the highest official exposure tier and observed usage of AI assistants is already high, which is consistent with how much of the work is text, tables and synthesis. Questionnaire drafting, open-end coding, cross-tab generation, chart production and first-draft reporting are all being automated in the current window. What remains human is deciding what is worth asking, judging whether the sample and method can bear the weight of the conclusion, catching the plausible but wrong AI summary, and persuading a client to change a decision. Employment in the broader occupation is projected to keep growing, so this is a role being reshaped at speed rather than removed; the analysts most at risk are those whose output is mainly the deck rather than the judgement behind it.

Sector readiness

Very High Adoption Across Research Platforms

The major survey, panel and insight platforms have embedded generative features into the core workflow, so most agencies and in-house teams are already using AI whether or not they have a formal policy. Large research agencies and consumer-goods insight teams are furthest along, including experiments with synthetic respondents; public-sector and academic research moves more cautiously because of methodological and ethical scrutiny.

§ 02Position

Where you stand

i

Position yourself as the research designer who decides what to ask and which method will actually answer it, with AI handling the fielding and the first pass of analysis.

ii

Become the analyst clients trust to challenge a machine-generated finding, because you understand sampling, bias and the limits of the data.

iii

Move towards insight consulting, where the deliverable is a recommendation and a conversation with decision-makers rather than a report.

§ 03Actions
6 points

What this means for you

Concrete changes to how the work gets done, in the order you are likely to meet them.

  1. 01

    Design is the job now. Let the platform generate and code; make sure you are the person who frames the research question, chooses the method and defends the sample, because that is what the client is paying for.

  2. 02

    Audit the themes. AI-coded open-ends are fast but they merge and miss categories; read a sample of raw responses against every automated theme before it goes into a report.

  3. 03

    Learn the limits of synthetic respondents. Clients will ask about them; be able to explain where simulated answers are useful for pre-testing and where they are not a substitute for real people.

  4. 04

    Present, do not just deliver. A report that is read aloud by an AI summary has no author; a presentation where you answer hard questions does.

  5. 05

    Pick up the quantitative tools. Basic statistics, a bit of Python or R and comfort with data pipelines let you check and extend what the platforms produce.

  6. 06

    Stay close to the decision. Ask what the client will do differently as a result of the study, and write the research around that, because studies without a decision attached are the first to be automated away.

§ 04Causes
6 drivers

What is pushing this change

  1. 01

    Generative features in survey platforms. Qualtrics, SurveyMonkey and their rivals draft questionnaires, flag poor questions and summarise results inside the product, removing whole steps from the workflow.

  2. 02

    Automated coding of open text. Language models theme and sentiment-score thousands of verbatim answers in minutes, work that used to take a junior analyst days.

  3. 03

    AI-moderated qualitative research. Tools such as Remesh run large live conversations and cluster responses, blurring the line between qualitative depth and quantitative scale.

  4. 04

    General-purpose assistants. ChatGPT, Claude and Microsoft 365 Copilot summarise transcripts, draft reports and build charts, and observed usage in this occupation is already high.

  5. 05

    Synthetic respondents. Simulated panels built on language models are being tested for concept screening and pre-testing, reducing demand for some early-stage fieldwork.

  6. 06

    Client pressure on cost and speed. Buyers expect faster, cheaper studies now that the tools exist, which pushes agencies to automate everything that can be automated.

§ 05Variation
4 sectors

Impact by sector

The headline figure is an average. Where you work changes the picture.

Research agencies

Agencies compete on price and speed, so the automation of fielding, coding and reporting is most advanced here and junior analyst intakes are shrinking.

In-house consumer-goods and retail insight teams

Teams embedded in the business are shifting towards continuous data and AI summarisation, with the analyst acting as internal consultant to brand and product teams.

Healthcare and pharmaceutical research

Regulatory and ethical requirements keep more human oversight in design and interpretation, slowing the pace of change.

Public sector and social research

Methodological transparency and sensitivity around populations mean AI is used for drafting and coding but rarely for unsupervised analysis.

§ 06Preparation
6 skills

Skills to build

The skills that keep the human part of this work valuable as the routine part is automated.

  1. 01

    Research design and sampling. Knowing which method answers which question, and what a sample can and cannot support, is the skill that AI output most depends on; formal training through a research association is worth the time.

  2. 02

    Statistical literacy. Being able to check significance, weighting and segmentation yourself lets you catch errors in automated analysis; a short applied statistics course covers most of what is needed.

  3. 03

    Prompting and output verification. Learn how to instruct AI tools precisely and how to test their summaries against the raw data, because unchecked AI output is the main new source of error in research.

  4. 04

    Data handling in Python or R. Light scripting lets you clean, merge and re-analyse data outside the platform's constraints and makes you useful to data science colleagues.

  5. 05

    Storytelling and presentation. Turning findings into a recommendation that an executive will act on is the part of the job furthest from automation; practise by presenting rather than sending.

  6. 06

    Commercial understanding. Understanding the client's business model and decision cycle lets you frame research around decisions, which is where the fee justifies itself.

§ 07Instruments
6 entries

Tools in use

Kinds of tool worth knowing

  1. 01

    Synthetic respondent panels. An emerging category of language-model-based simulated respondents used for concept pre-testing; understand the method and its limits before a client asks.

Named tools already in use

  • Qualtrics

    Visit

    Experience-management platform whose AI features draft surveys, flag methodological problems and theme open-text responses.

  • SurveyMonkey Genius

    Visit

    Built-in assistant that generates questionnaires, estimates completion rates and analyses responses within SurveyMonkey.

  • Remesh

    Visit

    AI-moderated live conversation platform that clusters and summarises responses from hundreds of participants at once.

  • ChatGPT

    Visit

    Used by analysts to summarise transcripts, draft discussion guides and generate first-pass report text.

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot

    Visit

    Summarises research in Word and PowerPoint and helps build and interpret analyses in Excel.

§ 08Examples
3 examples

In practice

Ways people in this role are already using AI, and what they get from it.

Open-end coding at scaleExample 1
How

An analyst runs several thousand verbatim survey answers through the platform's AI theming, then checks a sample against each theme and merges or splits categories before reporting.

Gain

Qualitative depth is available on quantitative samples without a week of manual coding.

Discussion guide and transcript synthesisExample 2
How

A general assistant drafts a discussion guide from the research brief, then summarises each focus-group transcript with supporting quotes for the analyst to verify.

Gain

Turnaround on qualitative projects falls from weeks to days.

Report first draftExample 3
How

Copilot produces narrative text and charts from the cleaned data tables, and the analyst rewrites the interpretation and recommendation sections.

Gain

Analysts spend their time on what the findings mean rather than on formatting.

§ 09Context

How this role compares

Three neighbouring roles chosen to show the direction of travel, then the roles either side of yours on the exposure scale.

CopywritersMore exposed · exposure 76
AI impact

Generative models produce marketing copy directly, so the output of the role is substituted rather than assisted.

Work moves to

Market research analysts keep a methodological role that copywriters lack; the lesson is to stay on the judgement side of the work.

Data ScientistsDifferent skills, growing · exposure 70
AI impact

AI writes much of the code, but the demand for people who can build and validate models on business data keeps rising.

Work moves to

Quantitative modelling and engineering skills; a realistic path for analysts who extend their statistics and scripting.

Brand ManagersComplementary, less exposed · exposure 56
AI impact

Brand managers use AI for analysis and content, but ownership of strategy, budget and stakeholder decisions stays with the human.

Work moves to

Commercial decision-making built on research insight; the natural client-side move for an experienced analyst.

Nearby on the scaleExposure · window
  1. Writers and Authors

    760–4 yrs
  2. Medical Coders and Health Records Specialists

    770–3 yrs
  3. Data Engineers

    780–3 yrs
  4. Market Research Analysts · this report

    780–3 yrs
  5. Computer Programmers

    810–2 yrs
  6. Data Entry Keyers

    830–3 yrs
  7. Interpreters and Translators

    831–4 yrs

Put this role next to another: vs Copywriters · vs Data Scientists · vs Brand Managers · pick any role

§ 10Verdict

Closing judgement

The mechanics of market research, from fielding a survey to producing a deck of cross-tabs, are now largely machine work, and clients know it. Your value is in asking a better question than the client arrived with, knowing when the data cannot support the answer they want, and telling them so clearly. Get fluent with the AI features in your platforms so you can check their output rather than fear it, and spend the hours they free up getting closer to the business decisions your research is meant to inform.

Follow this score

Hear when 78 changes

Scores are rebuilt as the underlying datasets update. Leave an email and we will tell you when this one moves, by how much, and which input did it.

No account needed. Every email carries a one-click unsubscribe.

§ 11Basis
revised 5 October 2026

Evidence and revisions

What the exposure figure rests on, what changed when it was last revised, and the published work cited for this role.

Score

78

Window

0-3 years (unchanged)

The 5 October 2026 review held the score.

Exposure Index v2. Inputs: task applicability 70/100 (Microsoft AI applicability score 0.35 for Market research analysts and marketing specialists); observed usage 86/100 (Anthropic observed exposure 0.65); official exposure tier 100/100 (BLS: very high); labour-market trajectory 32/100 (BLS projects employment to grow 7% over 2025–35); published adoption rating 85/100 (very high adoption). Weighted base 77.8. Final score 78. New report: the window of 0-3 years is set from the score band.

How the figure is builtExposure Index v2
InputScaledWeightPoints
Task applicabilityMicrosoft Research, AI applicability score7035%24.5
Observed usageAnthropic Economic Index, observed exposure8620%17.3
Official exposure tierUS BLS AI-exposure category10020%20.0
Labour-market trajectoryUS BLS projected employment change 2025–353310%3.3
Published adoption ratingThis report’s adoption level8515%12.8
Weighted base77.8
Exposure score78

Inputs not measured for this occupation are dropped and the other weights renormalised. Scaling rules and the adjustment policy are in the method note below and the research library.

Measures behind the score4 sources

US Bureau of Labor Statistics · Employment Projections 2025–35 and AI Exposure Categories

Official statistics · 27 August 2026

AI-exposure tier: Very high. Projected employment change 2025–35: +7%. Matched to Market research analysts and marketing specialists.

Publisher PDF Archived copy Data

Microsoft Research · Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations

Working paper · 10 July 2025

AI applicability score 0.35 for SOC 13-1161; scaled to 70/100 as the task-applicability input.

Anthropic · Anthropic Economic Index report: Cadences

Report · 26 June 2026

Observed exposure 0.65 for SOC 13-1161; scaled to 86/100 as the observed-usage input.

UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology · Assessment of AI capabilities and the impact on the UK labour market

Report · 28 January 2026

UK context: around 70% of UK workers are in occupations with tasks AI could perform or enhance, above the US average; a one-standard-deviation rise in exposure was associated with a 3.9% fall in UK job postings.

Archived copies are served only where the licence permits; otherwise the link goes to the publisher. Full research library →

§ 12Second opinion

Readers' view

What people who do this work make of our reading: their own scores, their reasons, and the notes they left on each section.

Our report is one reading of the evidence. This section is the other dataset: what people who do or know this work make of it. Nobody has scored this role yet. Sign in to add yours.

Scoresreaders vs. our figure
Readers (mean)

—

Readers (median)

—

CareerGuard

78

0┊ our figure 78100
Why readers chose their number

No one has explained their score yet. A line or two about what you see in your own work is the most useful thing on this page.

Most helpful notes

No notes yet. Every section above has a “Readers' notes” line at the bottom; open one and say what you know.

§ 13Appendix

Method and sources

Each report was written from a large body of published research. The exposure score itself is computed, not written: it is the CareerGuard Exposure Index, a weighted average of occupation-level measures from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (AI-exposure classification and 2025–35 projections), Microsoft Research (AI applicability scores) and Anthropic (observed exposure), together with the adoption rating published on the report. The organisations and publications below are the standing literature behind the narrative sections. Every source, with dates, licences and archived copies where we are permitted to hold them, is catalogued in the research library.

Exposure Index v2 (October 2026). Each input is scaled to 0–100 and weighted: task applicability 35% (Microsoft AI applicability score ÷ 0.5), observed usage 20% (Anthropic observed exposure ÷ 0.75), official exposure tier 20% (BLS very high = 100, high = 70, moderate = 40, low = 10), labour-market trajectory 10% (50 − 2.5 × projected % employment change), published adoption rating 15% (very high = 85, high = 70, medium-high = 55, medium = 40, low-medium = 25, low = 10). Inputs not measured for an occupation are dropped and the remaining weights renormalised. An editorial adjustment of at most ±12 points is allowed only for automation channels the measures cannot see (robotics, self-service, machine vision, medical imaging, RPA/OCR, generative video) and is always logged with its reason. Scores are whole numbers, not rounded to five. The change window shifts one notch (a year at each end) per ten points of movement.

Research library: every source, with dates, licences and archived copies →

IGlobal and macroeconomic impact of AI on work
World Economic Forum
The Future of Jobs Report series — Employer survey of expected job growth and decline, skill shifts and technology adoption (2020, 2023 and 2025 editions); Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Entry-Level Work (2026).
AI governance and transformation reports — Frameworks on ethical AI, talent strategy and industry transformation.
McKinsey Global Institute
AI, Automation and the Future of Work series — Research quantifying automation potential by task, sector and demographic, from "Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained" to "Agents, robots, and us" (2025).
Industry-specific reports — Financial services, healthcare, manufacturing and others.
PwC
Global AI Jobs Barometer — Annual analysis of job postings and productivity by AI exposure (2024–2026 editions).
Upskilling Hopes and Fears survey — Employee perceptions and readiness.
Microsoft Research and Anthropic
Working with AI (2025); Anthropic Economic Index (2025–2026) — Occupation-level usage data from Copilot and Claude conversations, the two observed-usage measures behind the 2026 revision.
Stanford Digital Economy Lab and Stanford HAI
Canaries in the Coal Mine? (2025–2026); AI Index Report (annual) — Payroll evidence on early-career employment in exposed occupations; annual measurement of AI capability, investment and adoption.
Deloitte
Human Capital Trends series — Workforce, talent and HR technology trends.
Tech Trends series — Emerging technologies and their business implications.
Accenture
Technology Vision series — Forward-looking analysis of emerging technology, with emphasis on AI.
Fjord Trends — Design, innovation and human experience in a digital world.
Boston Consulting Group
AI/ML insights and industry solutions — "The AI Revolution in the Workplace" and related research.
EY
AI and workforce reports — Adoption, talent strategy and ethics.
IBM Institute for Business Value
AI and automation studies — Business models, workforce evolution and leadership.
OECD
AI Policy Observatory — International data and policy on AI, labour markets and skills.
Employment Outlook — Labour-market trends including technological impact (2023–2026 editions).
International Labour Organization
Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure (2025) — Task-level exposure gradients for every ISCO occupation; successor to the 2023 global index.
International Monetary Fund
Staff Discussion Notes on AI and work (2024, 2026) — Complementarity framing: where AI augments and where it substitutes.
UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Assessment of AI capabilities and the impact on the UK labour market (2026) — UK occupational exposure and job-posting evidence.
Brookings Institution
AI and automation research — Economic and social implications, displacement and skills.
Yale Budget Lab and Goldman Sachs Research
Tracking the Impact of AI on the Labor Market; AI and the US labour market (2026) — Aggregate labour-market monitoring; macro displacement estimates.
Oxford University (Oxford Martin School)
The Future of Employment — Frey & Osborne and subsequent research on susceptibility to automation.
MIT Technology Review
AI & Work — Reporting on AI research and its implications for industries and jobs.
Gartner
Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence — Maturity and adoption of AI technologies.
Future of Work reports — Workplace models and talent strategy.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Employment Projections 2025–35; AI Exposure Categories; Occupational Outlook Handbook — Ten-year employment projections and, from the 2025 cycle, an AI-exposure tier for every detailed occupation.
Indeed Hiring Lab
AI at Work Report (2025) and posting-market updates — Skill-level transformation estimates and job-posting trends by occupation.
IICore AI and machine-learning research
OpenAI
Research papers, blog and API documentation — Large language models, generative AI, safety and societal impact.
Google DeepMind
Research papers and blog — Reinforcement learning, AI for science, AGI and ethics.
Meta AI
Research papers and blog — Large language models, computer vision, AI for social good.
Hugging Face
Transformers library and model hub — Open-source state-of-the-art NLP models.
TensorFlow and PyTorch
Documentation and community forums — Core frameworks illustrating practical capability.
arXiv
cs.AI, cs.LG, cs.CV, cs.CL — Pre-print research.
NeurIPS and ICML
Conference proceedings — Top-tier academic research.
ACM and IEEE
Journals and proceedings — ACM Computing Surveys; IEEE Transactions on AI.
Kaggle
Datasets and competition solutions — Applied machine learning on real-world problems.
The Alan Turing Institute
Research and reports — Responsible and applied AI.
IIIEthical and responsible AI deployment
NIST
AI Risk Management Framework — Voluntary framework for managing AI risk.
European Commission
AI Act — Risk-tiered legal framework for AI.
Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI — Principles for responsible development.
Partnership on AI
Research and best practice — Responsible AI development.
AI Now Institute
Annual reports — Social implications: power, inequality, rights.
ACM FAccT
Proceedings — Fairness, accountability and transparency.
Data & Society
Publications — Social implications of data-centric technology.
WIPO
Conversation on IP and AI — Intellectual-property implications of AI.
IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of A/IS
Ethically Aligned Design — Recommendations for ethical AI design.
Center for AI and Digital Policy
Policy briefs — Accountable AI policy.
Report No. 352 · Market Research AnalystsPDF · Markdown · Compare · Research library · Reading →